Friday, March 21, 2008

Gleason's Gym

The last time I went to the part of Brooklyn now popularly known as DUMBO was in 1997. I went to Gleason's Gym because I was interested in boxing and wanted to see one of the oldest boxing gyms in America.

Getting there felt like a dangerous adventure. It was the middle of nowhere, it seemed, a wasteland of forgotten cobblestoned streets in the dark shadow of the rusty Manhattan Bridge. I did not feel safe, but I did feel brave. And that seemed like the right feeling to have when you go to a real boxing gym. It's impossible to have that feeling today.



I went back to Gleason's last week to find an entire world turned upside-down. The gym is in the same place, but everything around it has changed. There's a West Elm and a Bo Concept on the first floor. The affluent walk the scrubbed cobblestones, shopping for luxury goods. Gourmet markets sell $5 single-serving bottles of juice.



Gleason's sign is on the outside door, but it's dwarfed by a sign for The Fitness Guru. I waited for their customers to come down the stairs, carrying a fleet of Bugaboo strollers, figuring a Mommy and Me class had just let out. I trembled to think what I would find inside Gleason's.



Thankfully, not much has changed inside the old gym. Once the door closes behind you, you can imagine you're still on a former Front Street. Aside from a few young women in hot-pink gloves and a few middle-aged men with white-collar faces, the room is filled with boxers, serious and sweating. Champions and contenders still train at Gleason's.

The owner, Bruce Silverglade, sits by the door and makes you feel welcome--but inside you still get that unsafe feeling. And it feels good. Men are beating each other. Other men dance around the floor, punching heavy bags. A bell goes off and they all drop their hands. It goes off again and the soft/hard sound of fists and gasps resumes. The room seethes with aggression.



I got comfortable next to a ring where two men were sparring, one small and brown, one big and white (and clearly white collar). Sometime in the late 1990s, about the time of my first visit, Gleason's instituted White Collar Boxing and this has enabled them to stay afloat.

I understand the businessman's wish to have his courage challenged--I long for it myself--and I could never get in the ring, so I hold back my judgment. But I did feel a thrill that day watching the small brown man beat the crap out of the big white man. His face turned red and, unable to bear it any longer, he threw in the towel.

The other brown men standing ringside (they looked like trainers or retired boxers) had a good laugh, slapping each other on the backs. One turned to me, flashing a toothless grin, and chuckled, "He quit! That guy quit. He quit!" Like it was the funniest joke in the world. And it must have felt like a triumph, a moment of victory over the Big White Man, that symbol of imperialism, invasion, gentrification. At least, it felt that way to me.



Back on the manicured street, the victory faded. I saw that beaten man again, in one of the gourmet markets. His face was still pink, but he didn't wear any look of defeat. He was glowing, proudly bearing to the checkout counter his overpriced bottle of juice, secure in the knowledge that, no matter how many punches he took at Gleason's, he would still walk out to the streets of DUMBO the winner.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Gleason's gym used to train working class Irish and Italian boxers as well.

judy said...

Try Kingsway Boxing Gym on 28th & Fifth Ave in Manhattan.

Anonymous said...

I have been reading this blog for awhile now and as much as I love your effort and totally share your sadness over what is happening to our city, I can't help but wish that you would more often focus on the things that are still here. I see them everyday. Last weekend I went to Carnegie Deli for the first time, wandered down 57th and went to Rizzoli, followed by a stop at Scandinavia House on Park. It was an amazing day that could not take place anywhere else in the world. Today I plan on hitting Donut Pub before walking around the Chelsea galleries. I dunno....I guess what I am saying is that NYC is too immense for everything that is great about it to be wiped away. As much as I will mourn the loss of Florent I know that I will find a new place that I might just love just as much. Not sure where it will be or if it will be old or new but I know I'll find it. You seem to be focusing on a very specific side of NYC passing away. And as much as I also love the slightly shabby, old world, traditional places, I am aware that there has, for a very long time, been many other faces of New York as well. I love alot of those faces, and hate some of the new ones as well. I would'nt be caught dead in a starbucks,chipotle,jamba juice, etc. For everyone of them there is still dozens of independent businesses nearby for me to support. I guess ultimately I would love to see a little less pessimisim here and a bit more focus on what you love about the city, because underneath all of the awful new buildings, and characterless yuppie businesses, there are still brilliantly unique places everywhere. Trust me, i feel the way you do most of the time, but I'm fighting to focus on the good, because otherwise I would be miserable.

Jeremiah Moss said...

hey anon, i feel your pain. i really do. but if i only focused on what remains, i'd have to call the blog "remaining new york."

that said, you might notice that most of what i do here is, actually, about what remains. most recently gleason's and chez brigitte. donut pub's in here too.

in general, though, i'm not a "look on the bright side" kind of guy. i think we've got enough of that in america. someone's gotta pay attention to the other side of bright.

i hope you'll keep reading--and if you've got ideas of places that remain and should be covered here, do let me know.

Todd HellsKitchen said...

Thanks for reminding me that I need to get over and check out DUMBO... I think they have an Arts Fest every Spring. I gotta get over there!

Anonymous said...

Jeremiah, as I've said before, you are singular in your reporting how the city is being killed off bit by bit. I see no reason to be elated that Bed/Bath/Whatever, K-Mart, Star$, the Trumps or any of the other short fingered vulgarians are still with us. One day, JVNY will be the source when historians address the mosaic of a massive obituary.

Anonymous said...

That might have been one of the most racist blog entries I have ever read.

Jeremiah Moss said...

i published that last anonymous comment because i find it concerning. as they sing in Ave Q, "everyone's a little bit racist" and i have no illusions that i am immune. that was not my intention here and i wonder what elicited this response.

was it my observation of racial and class dynamics? was it my choice of language, referring to skin color? was it discomfort raised by the image of a brown-skinned man beating a white-skinned man?

i call attention to this because racism plays a major part in gentrification in the city and it isn't talked about enough.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to add a comment to this as someone who has and continues to get into the ring on a regular basis in amateur boxing. I just came across your blog--I work in urban planning and community outreach and the luxury condos and developments drive me as insane as anyone. But this post struck me as ridiculous. I'm a white guy from a reasonably wealthy background but I've found boxing to be an environment where nothing about the person, where they come from, what they look like, or what their story is, matters. Boxers are very diverse and I've trained with those who come from a striking variety of backgrounds, from Russians with PhDs, to immigrant Italian women, to native Africans, to kids who grew up in "bad neighborhoods" and all are some of the most down-to-earth, genuine people I've met. We may fight during the intervals but at the end everyone hugs and congratulates each other and the mutual respect is deep. I've witnessed racial tension and rivalry before but never, ever in the gym, and you should be careful about judging the community and its attitudes without ever stepping in yourself.

Anonymous said...

I want to agree with the poster above. I go to Gleasons and I've always been impressed by the comity of the place. I was intimidated by the professional boxers at first, but when I started talking to them I found a group of funny, friendly people eager to share their knowledge. Many of them still talk about Brooklyn with the pride and enthusiasm I felt growing up, instead of the bitter nostalgia of my other friends. I agree with you that the changes in the neighborhood are depressing. But I don't think they've infected the gym. Why try to twist a great place and a great sport into a race and class war?

Anonymous said...

"was it discomfort raised by the image of a brown-skinned man beating a white-skinned man?"

No, it's the fact that you would somehow take pleasure in that aspect.
Furthermore, you associate the white boxer with gentrification. That seems like quite a reach, for as others have pointed out, there have been big white men fighting in Gleason's since its inception.

Your comment can't be taken as anything other than a racially-based comment, and you should be ashamed of that.

john said...

Sheesh, social relations so poisoned by history and animosity that to even look at things from a racial angle makes you "racist!!!" and the conversation ends.

Historical patterns flow through individuals, whether fair or fitting in the moment or not.

JM only pointed out a poignant moment loaded with deeper meanings.

Knee-jerk reactions happen when sensitive subjects are touched. But reasoned, open-minded convo should go on.

Web 2.0 just may save the world, or at least bitch articulately about it ending.

elisa said...

what makes it racist is that he projected those meanings onto the people he saw, without talking to or knowing any of them, based on their skin color.

Jeremiah Moss said...

"projecting meaning" is not the definition of racism, which is all about real oppression and painful discrimination.

projecting meaning is something all humans do all the time. i made an observation, based on numerous external factors and my own subjectivity, that there were race and class tensions being worked out in that ring.

by labeling observations involving race (and class) "racist" you dilute the important meaning of racism and take away its thrust.

i appreciate the wish to believe that race and class tensions are not present in that gym and in that neighborhood, and in many places around the city, but they exist. should we pretend not to see them?