tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-683382864156505640.post1780637603681134565..comments2008-05-07T22:49:49.551-04:00Jeremiah Mossnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-683382864156505640.post-49345875318879896312008-05-07T22:19:00.000-04:002008-05-07T22:19:00.000-04:002008-05-07T22:19:00.000-04:00Even if it needs to come down, and even if he didn't mind, the corner won't be the same without it. Viva the characters of NYC! - EAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-683382864156505640.post-57991203670382706302008-05-07T19:43:00.000-04:002008-05-07T19:43:00.000-04:002008-05-07T19:43:00.000-04:00Thanks for the update, Jeremiah. I feel a little better about this too. I'd like to see some of it remain. At least his art lives on at Sophie's (there's quite a bit, actually).EV Grievehttp://sophiesbar.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-683382864156505640.post-26884889512044005742008-05-07T16:57:00.000-04:002008-05-07T16:57:00.000-04:002008-05-07T16:57:00.000-04:00I don't see why they can't landmark art - they can landmark buildings, or districts; why not sculpture?Richard Nickel, Jr.http://www.blogger.com/profile/15777516635980832695noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-683382864156505640.post-4544888332872731492008-05-07T15:01:00.000-04:002008-05-07T15:01:00.000-04:002008-05-07T15:01:00.000-04:00Since Eddie himself said he didn't care what happened to the sculpture, in that case, I guess it's ok to tear the tower of toys down. But do not tear it down solely because that it's deemed to be an eyesore.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com